An Open Letter to ‘Old Media’.
Sometimes I wish I understood, but could not seem to comprehend why you do it, but then minutes later I did not give a damn anymore. And that is why you will fail.
Why are you so set on who you want the presidential candidates to be? Is it that you see that the Status Quo is threatened? Is change such a bad thing? Maybe the reason doesn’t matter. In the end of each day, no matter if you are a democrat, republican, liberal, conservative, neo-con, corporate power representative, or what ever else … We are all still United States Citizens. We all care about America, right … Right? The sad truth is that we do not. Perhaps liberty is not a concern of the powerful, and If you do not care, then I can not care for you. And that is why you will fail.
For years you have force fed what you deem to be important down the throats of Americans citizens. Minimized most of what the public should be concerned about while sensationalizing the mundane and trivial. Did you do it for the all powerful dollar? The same dollar that is now worth half of what it was worth a few years ago? Even as I ask, the reason does not matter. And that is why you will fail.
I must admit that you almost had me. At one time I felt that the United States reigned supreme, the greatest, the infallible, the just. Those were happy times … so I happily ignored reality while I sort-of-listened to your newscasters tell me how it really was. Oh yes, I remember … The ‘Sold’ war. The logic, your logic, to me it made sense. it was simple really, simple enough for the average channel surfer or newspaper reader to get: To defend, we must go on the offensive. To protect ourself, we must attack them. And years later, after the reasons we went there had changed and changed again … And when there was no army left for us to fight … new reasons were given to us as to why we are still there and why we had to stay and can not leave. But, like so many others, I could flip through the channels, not feeling anything as the casualty toll rose and rose. And that is why you will fail.
If not for you, maybe I would not have ever given a damn. I do not remember exactly when, or how it happened, I can only remember the ‘why‘: Giuliani Vs. Clinton, or maybe Rommy Vs. Obama or maybe it would be McCain VS. Edwards. Flick, flick, flick, same, same, same, ‘one of these guys WILL be your candidate, we say so’. I change the channel again. I could not care less because I did not care at all. And that is why you will fail.
I must thank you for opening my eyes. You see, somewhere in the haze, something began to stand out. Every once in a while I would be trying to ignore you while waiting for the next rerun of my favorite show and you would continue to tell us who our president would be. Then you went out of your way to tell us that there was someone who has ‘No chance’ and you did not know why they were even trying. At first I dismissed it, after all, you were telling us who was ‘winning’, and you could be trusted, but the more I heard about the guy who absolutely had ‘NO CHANCE!’, this man, ‘Ron Paul would never … could never …’, the closer I began to listen. Somehow if you hear shouting for so long, it simply becomes background noise and the smallest whisper can be heard. In all of your screaming about who was winning, the only thing I picked up was the name that you said could not. And that is why you will fail.
“Google Ron Paul!” a sign said. It was somewhere on a side street in MD. I passed it as I drove home one day. Because of you, I remembered that name. I wanted to see what it was about this person that made you so sure he could not be in the running. So I went home and looked up the name. I do not even have to tell you what happened then. Almost any American that does it for themselves already knows what I’m talking about. I will never forget that it was your bias against this man that made me remember him. And that is why you will fail.
Now as I close out this letter, I imagine that for every person who looked into this so called ‘No Chance’ candidate you think to your collective selves: “So What! You are in the minority, you still have no chance! No Chance! No Chance!” I would just like to point out that our numbers (even though they continue to grow substantially), do not matter. They truly do not. Have you realized why yet? No? It’s because the average person that listens to you is exactly like I was. You tell them who you think our next president will be and they will happily sit back and accept that you know what you are talking about. On their recliners or couches, fine with the status quo, they do not think they count and they will not make an effort to vote. After all, You told them the battle has already been decided. With the exception of the ones who look in to the only person who can not win, the rest will not give a damn at all … ever. Meanwhile this minority, this revolution, it does what it does, these amazing things that have never been done before, these are the people who are out there making a change, and then there is you, continuing to do the best thing for us by ignoring Ron Paul. And that is why you will fail.
mBxiIMclI3E
Everyone else, you’re welcome to partake in the Tea Party of ‘07! Thanks for reading.
No, and that’s exactly the problem: it’s not that simple. Even if Ron Paul did get elected President, this paranoid vision of the world you have where the gov’t “runs your life and drains your pocketbook” would remain largely unchanged.
You think he’s the first candidate to pitch this revolutionary tripe? You forget Nader, Perot, et al? Fringe nutball candidates all say that, they count on that sentiment, even when their politics diverge dramatically.
I’m not entirely pleased with the state of gov’t at the moment, but if you really believe it’s running your life and draining your pocketbook then you’ve got bigger problems than the government.
The Ron Paul “Revolution” is most certainly going away. It’ll go away when it’s supporters either grow up or become distracted by something else.
Vaughn: Is China being an isolationist because they don’t have troops in America? Do you always regurgitate nonsense without actually thinking about what you are saying? North Korea, East Germany, I would agree about them being isolationists, but bringing all the military home is not isolationism.
I love how you guys are “just waking up to the media’s bullshit” when the rest of the world has seen it all along…I think the best thing you guys can do is travel…visit the rest of the world…and learn…
Ugh. Does everyone around here resort to ridiculous rhetorical questions like “Do you always regurgitate nonsense without actually thinking about what you are saying?”?
Yes, Reason, that’s it exactly. Touche.
Paul spouts nonsense about how 9/11 happened because we’ve had bases over there. Is he saying that we shouldn’t have forward military bases? Is he saying we shouldn’t have pushed Saddam out of Kuwait? That it wasn’t our problem to deal with?
Now, that’s isolationist, but if you have a different word for it, great! I’m not here to argue semantics, and I think we both know where the other stands in terms of effect of policy.
You guys see a difficult few years in Iraq and from that have taken a twisted, revisionist view of the world wherein if we just didn’t engage in some way that we have, it’d be a happier place.
Well, I think that’s naive and silly, and Ron Paul in building a campaign around the thought, is either flagrantly irresponsible or, more likely, flagrantly stupid. Either way, his campaign offends me and I can’t wait until it’s over.
The MSM doesn’t get a whole lot right, but if they aren’t taking Ron Paul seriously I say it’s because he doesn’t deserve to be taken seriously, and score one for the MSM.
Ron Paul 2008!
Hope for America!
Be a Part of It!
Love this article, please feel free to become a guest poster on my blog, I can do the same for you if you’d like. I’ve been trying to focus on how people can promote Ron Paul, because I feel generating Ideas for promotion is great, but I still lack posts like this since I can’t write like you.
Http://whois-ron-paul.blogspot.com
Anyone else reading this I would love to have anyone post on my blog that wants to be a guest blogger so I can focus on promotion and you can provide all the backlinks to your sites that you want. I’ve already got 3 posts that have over 15 diggs, and a lot of support quickly. I’ve been indexed in google in less then 48 hours, and I’ve already got a lot of content, and I was at a football game and watching football all day, so really I only have been supporting him for 1 day. But I know a lot about different free internet marketing ideas, and I want to make my site grow. I support Ron Paul and want to help him.
Please make comments on my site as I took off a “no follow” tag in the comment box, and what that means is your site will get more attention from search engines now that I removed the tag.
I can guest post in your blogs about how to promote ron paul in exchange if you want content on your blog, that way we both get content and links which generate more traffic, and more support for both of us.
Http://whois-ron-paul.blogspot.com
who is ron paul?
P.S.
Vaughn,
Why don’t you try something constructive, like supporting your own candidate in a positive manner? Who are you supporting and why are they so great? And why are my ideals so inferior to yours? You think your regurgitated rhetoric is going to hold any basis here? But hey, it’s your time to waste bro, just some advice…. Like your spewing of garbage isn’t 180 degrees out of phase with the message of the article that was just read. But hey, if you can’t figure out that walking into a drag race and talking about nascar isn’t going to get you anywhere so be it…
Vaughn: “Not trying to put these words in your mouth- so please correct me. Tell me what you’re saying.”
I believe my statements stand for themselves (because they contain actual content). I’ve noticed that you have not really addressed any of them.
“Are you saying that if I define myself as a conveservative, I should be Christian?”
No. I don’t believe even a casual reading of my statement would lead to that conclusion. Regardless of whether you are or are not, by subscribing yourself to the group labelled “conservatives,” you (presumably) subscribe yourself to that set of political beliefs which are held by the majority of people who consider themselves such. Am I making an incorrect assumption? Perhaps you need to define what you mean when you say “I am a conservative.”
“Are you saying that Ron Paul’s notion of “moral war†(whatever that is) is uniquely consistent with the intent of the architects of our government?”
Yes. If you can find any statement of one of the Founders which says otherwise, please post it. One of the major influences on their thinking was the history of endless wars which the European powers fought among themselves from time immemorial (leading up to both World Wars).
“Are you saying that if I find Paul’s surge populist, cheap, and crazy that I am somehow putting myself in opposition to the Constitution? I mean, really??”
Yes. RP’s “surge” is a result of 30 years of steadfast defense of our Constitution against flagrant abuse of it by both major political parties. While it is possible that someone could hold that document in reverance, while at the same time decrying someone who has spent his entire political career defending it, I would be hard-pressed to believe it. If you were to say “Well, I don’t like RP, but I don’t really like all the other politicians who’ve been pissing all over the Constitution, either”, then I could believe you, but that’s not what I’m hearing.
You lost at me at “your spewing of garbage…” something something. Couldn’t make much sense of that stuff after that.
But why am I here?
Because Ron Paul’s candidacy offends me. It’s populist fool’s gold to a group of supporters with a paranoid worldview. I mean – I can’t even count how many times I get accused of being a pawn of the MSM, or News Corp, or something. You guys are nuts!
And I happened to be sick today, with football to watch and a laptop in front of me, so I guess it’s just your good luck.
And as I mentioned previously, I love all the righteous indignation. It’s fan-tastic!
Seriously, kids?
Why don’t all of you “political activists” go outside of your house and be politicaly active as opposed to running your mouth on some blog that <.0001% of the US populace gives half a rat’s ass about?
That’s fantistic you guys found someone to rally behind, but you need to stop stroking each other over “the man that will lead us through the dark ages,” first.
Cowboy – I can respect Ron Paul’s defense of the Constitution in Congress without supporting his “bring home all military” presidential candidacy.
In fact, I tend to be a staunch and literal interpreter of the document. Nonetheless, I think a Paul presidency would be total disaster. Now, can you wrap your mind around that combination of beliefs, or does this mean in your eyes I have to be “asleep” or a pawn, or some betrayer of American ideals? Is this a “if you’re not with us or against us” thing?
Yes, indeed, you have the zeal of a revolutionary. Unfortunately, there just ain’t no revolution, brother.
V,
Well, I see you could not answer my simple candidate question I asked you. I’m assuming you understood that since you didn’t address it. Hmmmm, that sounds slightly familiar..
At any rate Thanks again to the author of the article and see you all at the Polls!!!!!!
If Ron Paul doesn’t win, we should all rise up in a bloody revolution to stop the murder of the planet by us Americans.
From Vaughn: “I hate populism. And the Ron Paul phenomenon is rampant populism. It is a reaction to people’s discontent with Iraq. He’s the one candidate in the Republican field figuring he can score a lot of points on the cheap by illustrating this crazy isolationist worldview.”
Good point, why listen to what most of the people want in this country? Lets just continue down the current path of the government blatantly ignoring the wishes of the people. As a matter of fact, why take real positions on any of the issues? Then Ron Paul might fit in with the rest of the Republican candidates. Why in the hell should he care that we are spending away our nation’s future, pissing away our civil liberties, and attempting to repeat history in another war where we tried to impose our will on another nation, all the while failing and losing great men and women doing it.
If you did a bit more research on him, you might find out that Ron Paul bases these “populist” positions of his off of the constitution, the founding fathers, and history, but really, what can these worthless things teach us? Who cares that he has been complaining about all of the issues he is standing against (war, fiscal irresponsibility, personal liberties, etc) for a very long time before his candidacy.
Also, I guess you are an isolationist if you don’t want to bomb other countries. Never mind if you still trade with them and have open and friendly dialog. Also, since us pulling our forces out would be viewed as “isolationist”, maybe we should encourage other nations to set up base here on our soil. I don’t think we would mind.
Like you said, why listen to this idiot. 10 terms in the house, serving in the military, and delivering babies are all recipes for a moron. What a stupid idea to take on the issues America cares about and have one solid foundation in the Constitution for all of your ideas!
Please Vaughn, if you really want to go on the attack, do your homework. I don’t care for some of the other candidates, but I don’t spam blog entries about them.
“Paul spouts nonsense about how 9/11 happened because we’ve had bases over there. Is he saying that we shouldn’t have forward military bases? Is he saying we shouldn’t have pushed Saddam out of Kuwait? That it wasn’t our problem to deal with?”
Yes, actually, that’s exactly what’s he’s saying. I respect that you have a different opinion on the matter, and understand the reasoning behind it. It would be nice if you made the effort to understand the reasoning of people that you disagree with, rather than simply calling them silly.
“Now, that’s isolationist, but if you have a different word for it, great! I’m not here to argue semantics, and I think we both know where the other stands in terms of effect of policy.”
Hmmm. I don’t think you’d agree if someone said that “warmongering” and “active defense” were just an issue of semantics.
You guys see a difficult few years in Iraq and from that have taken a twisted, revisionist view of the world wherein if we just didn’t engage in some way that we have, it’d be a happier place.
You could have (and maybe did, depending on how old you are) say exactly the same thing about our involvement with Vietnam. What is your opinion of how that unfolded, compared to the situation in Iraq (accounting for dis/similarities)?
“Well, I think that’s naive and silly, and Ron Paul in building a campaign around the thought, is either flagrantly irresponsible or, more likely, flagrantly stupid. Either way, his campaign offends me and I can’t wait until it’s over.”
So we can go back to things as usual.
“The MSM doesn’t get a whole lot right, but if they aren’t taking Ron Paul seriously I say it’s because he doesn’t deserve to be taken seriously, and score one for the MSM.”
Luckily, there *are* people who take these issues seriously (as there have been for thousands of years), and are willing to sacrifice at even a chance of making them come to pass.
“I can respect Ron Paul’s defense of the Constitution in Congress without supporting his “bring home all military†presidential candidacy.”
Now, *those* are two, quite separate things, and, once you actually put it that way, there is no issue.
“In fact, I tend to be a staunch and literal interpreter of the document. Nonetheless, I think a Paul presidency would be total disaster.”
That’s fine, as I said before. But saying that (and why) is very different than simply saying “Waaa!”
“Now, can you wrap your mind around that combination of beliefs, or does this mean in your eyes I have to be “asleep†or a pawn, or some betrayer of American ideals? Is this a “if you’re not with us or against us†thing?”
No, but I’m wondering why we had to go through 5 rounds of debate for you to just say so. (Believe it or not, I do actually have a life, and other things worth doing.)
“Yes, indeed, you have the zeal of a revolutionary. Unfortunately, there just ain’t no revolution, brother.”
Well, you’re entitled to your opinion. I respectfully disagree, and think that there are good reasons for doing so (like an enormous tax burden, currency devaluation, unbelievable deficit, total disregard for civil liberties, etc.).
Again, if you don’t happen to believe any of those things, or think they aren’t important or worth fighting against, then that’s your philosophical bag. And if it helps you to think of us as UFO-chasing wackos, then {shrugs}. Honestly, I wish you were right, and we could all just get on with our lives.
I’m telling all my friends about this! You all should do the same.
Fair enough. I appreciate you lining it up this way and concede I approach this one perhaps a bit more antagonistically than necessary.
But there isn’t a candidate on either side with him I disagree more vehemently. We don’t need to go over it – I realize I’m not changing minds here – but people made the same “it’s not our fight” arguments about involvement in Europe during WWII. Now, I’m not saying the situations are exactly the same, but strict adherence to the Paul philosophy would have held us out, at least as I understand it (correct me if I’m wrong).
I just can’t overstate how strongly I disagree with that point of view. When I say it offends me… it really does. I find it oversimplified, base, and mobbish. It’s dangerous and reactionary in the way a lynch mob is.
But that doesn’t mean you can’t have it, and I appreciate your explanations.
So, onwards and upwards, and we’ll see where we get…
All i hear are people telling me how great ron paul is. Well let me point something out. For one, Paul is putting forward a bunch of unrealistic resolutions that will never take place. For another thing, they would never work. Additionally posting “Ron Paul ‘08!” isn’t convincing anyone. It just shows that you’re ignorant and don’t know how to post anything logical about your candidate. And finally, this article sucks. Substitute any other “no chance” candidate for Ron Paul in this article, and it could be about anyone.
“But there isn’t a candidate on either side with him I disagree more vehemently.”
Even Gravel, lol?
“I just can’t overstate how strongly I disagree with that point of view. When I say it offends me… it really does. I find it oversimplified, base, and mobbish. It’s dangerous and reactionary in the way a lynch mob is.”
I really do understand why you feel that way. It’s a very human way of thinking. You know, there have been many times in the past when I gave up on the hope that the human race could ever really live with itself, that, although we have so much potential for good in us, we will never be able to live together without hatred and misunderstanding.
Libertarians see a world where we share a love of liberty and a respect for each other that makes the thought of war unbelievable. This is the hope which motivates us, that we can, through the example of our lives, and the sacrifices which it entails, bring that world into reality. I don’t know whether that dream will ever come to pass, but I will fight for it.
Onwards and upwards.
Nate: “Substitute any other “no chance†candidate for Ron Paul in this article, and it could be about anyone.”
Could be, but isn’t.
I truly do hope Ron Paul will become the republican candidate, but the thought of him seriously trying to overturn Roe vs. Wade really scares me. Kucinich ‘08!!
I find myself searching Youtube and Google for lastest article and video concerning Ron Paul. I am hungry for every word and every morsel concerning Ron Paul. This isn’t typically for me and so I know that if his message has affected me in this way it has affected many many others. Love the message, love the enthusiasm, love Ron Paul. I will be putting a sign on my front lawn, a sticker on my bumper, wear my Ron Paul shirt with pride and tell anybody that will listen. Thank you all.
wow. just wow. yes. thank you. though i hate to put it in french, viva la resistance. viva ron paul.